RockHardNYC

There are certain businesses in NYC that will absolutely NOT hire women who are obese. They will never admit the real reason. I currently work with well-known law firms. Beauty is appreciated, but brains and money seem to matter more. If an ordinary looking, obese woman brings in a shit load of money, she can become partner. The same is obviously true of models and product reps. True love can cause blindness. My trainer is hot. I wish I could post photos of him. I didn't pick him because of his looks. He was recommended to me by management. He's not a model, but he's got a sexy face and smile. He's very straight, ex-military, with two kids. A killer body. He doesn't lift weights. He believes in building a solid core through old-fashioned, boring exercise. He likes to give his clients a ten-minute massage after the workout. He never wears underwear, and it's easy to see his big, thick, flopping cock and low hanging balls in his sweat pants. He knows I enjoy when he touches my body with his junk when he massages me.

That may be an overly dramatic characterization of my voice, however, my disdain for a guy like deej can't be overstated enough. It took me awhile to learn what others had been saying for a long, long time. And I found out they were absolutely correct. My list is over six years old. She had more personalities than Sybil back then. She once sent me an email using a fake name to denigrate Oz and the MER site. I still have it. She vehemently denied sending it to me, calling me a liar on the board. When I called her on it by posting a screenshot of the two emails from the same IP address, but with different names, I got banned. I stopped paying attention to that lying, low-rent bitch long ago. I got banned numerous times for publicly criticizing Daddy's mods. If you want to survive there, you definitely don't want to question their tactics or their ethics. None of those assholes scared me. I didn't care if I got banned. Challenging their stupidity was worth it.

I'm not going to name names and reveal any of my sources. This homey don't play that. There are plenty of Daddy supporters. I also don't care if someone does not believe me.

Opinions matter, depending on the source. Does not matter how long a member has been a member, as long as there is some written record to rely upon. Many are not banned. The loyalty is not necessarily in honor of Daddy, although he has been known to be a sympathetic leader at times, and forgiving of escorts who cross the line with him. It's the Hooboy legacy. It's the escorts and their participation. It's the popular watering hole mentality. It's a natural dislike of change. It's the numbers. Lots of factors involved when analyzing a community. For newbies, it probably won't. But I can assure you, if deej is the new owner/inheritor of the forum, they won't be making a public announcement of that. With good reason. You're not hell-bent on lighting fires or testing waters. You probably have not challenged their character or definition of fairness. 4 years = new, IMO. Moderation has changed dramatically on that forum in the past 10 years. You cannot get away with trolling now the way one did many years ago. Deej is the ultimate TROLL. He lies with four faces. He's admitted "on record" to using multiple usernames. He is not to be trusted. If members wish to support him, that's on them. I would NEVER. She rarely treats anyone with respect. She's one of the most miserable online personalities I've ever encountered. If we were talking about any other reputable forum on the internet, she would have lost her admin privileges over a decade ago. I don't believe this falsehood for a second. But I do have access to certain facts. There is power in numbers, for sure.

That easily explains why you are here. Well, it's a bit more complicated than that. We old-timers (Lucky, Adam Smith, myself, etc.) know the back story. In some cases "original recipe" matters in marketing. Gay men are not immune to product allure and marketing strategies. Members who do not know the awful, dreadful, controlling personality of deej, the lies, deceit, and contempt of the man, will participate and contribute without thinking. But those of us who do know, will NEVER give one penny of our money or one minute of our precious time to contribute to his board. It's not polite to make fun of the lonely and infirm.

It's Lucky taking creative license, a talent he's put on a shelf for a very long time. Too long. If you're not "in the know," this thread will be almost impossible to follow. I feel kind of sorry for the latecomers. Yes, the thread at the other site has been deleted. The new de-linked "admin" deej is faster than a speeding bullet these days. Although, it did take him a long minute to figure out that he had been had. Don't waste your time. Whoever "admin" is, they no longer care to offer honest status info. Often, they don't want users to know or question their authority openly. You can't trust the status "words" that are currently listed, and that's the way they like it. You never want to fuck with someone who is in dire straights, be it health or finances. The drinky-pooh poster that some call "friend" may have thought she was being creative, but her words caused so much confusion, and the confusion had the potential to make "admin" look seriously bad. She gets a tickle in her balls when she stirs the pot, but she also likes to play with fire. People who like to play with fire often get burned and extinguished. No, he does not need anyone's permission. He never did. He loves that power, poor thing. Probably the only power he has in his life. Daddy is nowhere near as bad as others. I don't think Daddy's grouchiness plays any role in the newly de-linked forum. The board has new players, and I predict they're going to remain quiet about the truth behind de-linking. Whatever deal was made in the de-linking, it most definitely will not be shared with the public. Is anyone that dedicated to a board's bullshit troll activity? Screenshots are easy for me because I do them constantly for daily research. But when I don't have to... Considering she's supposed to be a professional IT guy, she often seems very slow. Perhaps that HUGE gut wears her energy down. I hear that people who carry an extra 100 pounds in their belly area tire very quickly. Changes were necessary with the asshole Sessions at Justice's helm, but the ailing, broke drama queen has always liked to stir up sympathy, especially when folks started donating. Truth be told, the review site is more labor intensive than the forum. Daddy spends as little time on the forum as he can. And now, with the new de-link, I bet he spends no time. It's all in other hands now. I'm no Ronan Farrow, but I know how to play one on TV. And those loose ends will remain and flourish. The new de-linked admin will be experts at keeping everyone guessing. Deej always loved his multiple usernames, created to maintain "control." The donations were always meant to support the work done on the review site. It's the review site that gets the most traffic and earned money from selling ad space. The forum was always click-bate for the review site. You can ask all the financial questions that tickle your fancy, but no one who knows the truth will tell you the truth. I suspect Daddy's IT services will continue on both sites and donations will go to him. That is, as long as he is able to do the work. If something were to happen to Daddy, it wouldn't surprise me if that news is kept silent. Keep the donations coming, cling to claiming the Hooboy legacy, keep the username Guy Fawkes "active," keep as many loyal members duped for as long as you can. It's a win-win for deej and co. Because, if anyone comes to find that deej is the new board owner, watch those loyal members leave in droves and watch the donations wither and die. And rightly so.

I suspect the person to whom you're referring is drinking again. Rumor has it that deej is the new board owner, hence his "admin" response. They're keeping ownership very hushed up and I think they're calling it "de-linked." They don't want to lose members and/or whatever Hooboy legacy they have left. Once members find out that B has divested his interest in the forum, there's no telling what might happen.

Ah, yes, the English. I'll take body odor over bad teeth any day. I find certain BO a turn-on. Squeaky clean only applies to ass. For me, it really depends on the stank. Licking an armpit is very much like picking a cologne. Certain notes are just plain wrong, while others are Obsession.

I think the word you wanted is olfactory. I'm not surprised that many people can't smell. Some especially can't smell themselves or their breath. I've had my share of experiences with bathhouses around the world. Given my appreciation for beauty, I'm not shy when it comes to striking up conversation with a Ryan Gosling/Bradley Cooper type. More often than not, conversations are ended too quickly because I want to distant myself from the foul odor. My MO tendency is to encourage others to talk about themselves. It can be deadly if the cute guy is chatty and his breath stinks. It sure is long enough in the sauna at my gym. If things go well, I usually invite them into my shower stall for another 5 minutes of fun.

But more than enough are drop-dead gorgeous. And plenty are way above average. Especially if they are reps. Most drug reps visiting doctor's offices in NYC are stunning. If the office is mostly women, the drug reps tend to be attractive men. My PCP runs a predominately gay practice. I'm not sure if the drug reps are gay who visit regularly, but the male reps who enter with their luxury briefcases sure are perty.

Not if their breath smells like shit on a shoe.

But I often enjoy what you have to say. So far so good. I'm not much of a blog person, but that doesn't mean anything. People read blogs to get specific information. If you're supplying information-in-need, you will always have readers. If you stop, or your info gets old and out-dated, then I suspect readership will go down.

Sounds like you've done proper analysis anyway. Sometimes, you can't always know every piece of data. If English is not your first language, and you're catering to an English-speaking audience, then IMO, it is amazing that you've experienced any growth. Personally, I have very little patience for broken English, written or spoken, unless I know you are just visiting.

Wearing an intellect a bit too proudly on one's shoulder can be exhausting for many people. Always needing to hear yourself speak and have the last word is another popular turn-off, quite evident among internet trolls. Even so, I do prefer to be in the company of people who are smarter than I. I consider the advantage of learning something new with each visit to be valuable. On the other hand, if one of my long-time guests complained about another guest, I would consider future invite lists. Definitely be more careful about seating. If the reason for the complaint was Trump support, I probably would un-invite the guest. I severely limit the amount of Trump in my house. I have cut-off cousins who insist on pushing all the wrong buttons with endless fervor.

Sorry, but you lost me at, "He had a Clark Kent look..." Clark Kent does nothing for me. Very rare for me to be sexually attracted to a dark-haired man. But perhaps this thread is not about me. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. It is well documented fact that the more attractive your face (and body), the more chances and opportunities you'll have. But everyone blessed with wisdom knows that physical beauty is fleeting. Life is short enough. Youthful beauty is much shorter. Still, since I'm a visual guy, I love looking at a true beauty. However, beauty is absolutely no indication that the sex will be fun or hot. Many good looking guys are jerks. No matter how handsome they are, I wouldn't want to share the company of a jerk one minute longer than necessary.

Congratulations on growing your audience. I confess I'm not familiar with your blog. If you don't mind answering, what do you think has caused this growth?

Oh, I don't know. They look about equal to me. Gotta give James some props. He is close to being the male version of Lena Dunham. Talented. Reasonably attractive face. At times funny. Not afraid to show naked body, well almost. Not many straight men in Hollywood would have the guts to do what James does for a laugh. But, then again. James has quite a bit of guts.

Speaking of gay, is anyone gayer than James Corden?

OK, not exactly. But it would be fun to see them kiss and have make-up sex. Michael Avenatti has made a new career of eviscerating Michael Cohen on TV. So imagine my shock and awe when Avenatti coyly revealed on ABC's This Week that "there's been an evolution" in their relationship. Apparently, Avenatti recently ran into Michael Cohen on the streets of Manhattan, they talked, and now they're staying in touch. Whoa! That is a serious shift in the lez-be-friends zeitgeist. Watching George Stephanopoulos, Alan Dershowitz, Dan Abrams, and Michael Avenatti go at it on TV, is more fun than a visit to the new Broadway play "Straight White Men." Dershowitz, who never tires of listening to himself talk, and gets a smiling boner at the mere sound of his voice, always delivers good TV. His ego is SO supersized, anyone who dares to appear with him is lucky to get one word into the discussion. I've never seen Abrams so on top of his game. With testosterone levels soaring and forehead lines screaming for more Botox, Abrams almost explodes his hair implants to take on Dershowitz, up to the bitter end of the segment. I love that Abrams got his last word in. And "Alan, please don't interrupt me" Avenatti, with the smoothest forehead in television, calmly and cooly knocks Dershowitz off his Harvard Emeritus anal prod. It was fantastic TV, so if you missed it, here it is:

He must really hate the special relationship a gay has with his dermatologist.

I can relate to that. 99.9% of my cousins are gun-loving Republicans (huge family of White breeders). Some of these Catholics held their nose and voted for Trump. A few are dealing with regret. Unfortunately, power, guns, and lower taxes are all some people care about. Many will make a pact with the devil if it means acquiring those things. Does this mean Jesus sent us Donald Trump to save Christianity and civilization? Holy shit! God help us all.

Especially don't read the review in the New York Times. It is scathing.

I agree. I saw Dunkirk more than once, and Harry delivered an impressive performance. A slow coming-out for a guy like Harry is the right game. Claiming bisexuality is all the rage these days among millennials. It makes no business sense to alienate all his female fans by killing their fantasy. It's so much better for business to keep some flame burning. Now he'll be in line to play a great gay character for the screen, like Timothée Chalamet, and the gays will be fine with that. I expect him to hit home runs. He's got the makings of a terrific career in film, and continue in music if that's what he wants.

The poor, lost, 18-year-old Bronson with bad skin, excelling in a sport where sweaty men wear a singlet and rub tightly up against each other. That's a tough spot to be in. And now his loving, understanding self opened his big mouth on camera, hurling a hate slur, and he lost his college scholarship. Maybe he's learned a tough lesson, or maybe he'll grow up hating gays even more, blaming them for his failures. What can any aesthete say about a Trump follower? Many deserve the crosses they bear in their lives. So many kids grow up with Republican parents, and end up carrying that torch simply because it's what mommy and daddy wanted. Or so they believed. How else can one explain masses of people voting against their own interests?

As an investor, we're very happy to hear that. I love, love, love the film, too. Thanks for the heads-up. I am a Prime member. Will catch it when I get a chance.