lookin

I can see again!! Thanks very much guys for bringing back the big pics! ⤠⤠⤠⤠⤠â¤

Like many of you browsing through these forums, I find my eye drawn to the Flirt 4 Free banner quite frequently and sometimes click on the picture of a particularly winsome model. I’ve got Mayak strutting his stuff in a small window right now: And last week, I spent an hour or so watching Juanjose V flicking his Bic quite seductively. I’ve also logged in to the website, read some of the model profiles and reviews, and watched the chat that goes on between them and other captivated gentlemen like myself. But that’s as far as I’ve gone. I’ve never turned over my credit card; never taken a model private, as they say, for six dollars a minute; and never watched a private show set up by someone else for three dollars a minute. I’m getting close, but thought I might first check with some of the cognoscenti here, and see if I could get some extra insights from any of you adventurers who have already taken the plunge. There have been a few Flirt 4 Free threads here which answered a few questions, but I’ve got a few more left. Like how likely is it that I’ll see a money shot if I take a model private for five - ten minutes? A small number of their reviews say it happens, but I’d want to be pretty sure of seeing a puddle of splooge on my guy’s belly or chest before the meter ran out. Don’t get me wrong, I know these guys need to make a living too, and am not expecting them to give up their last drop of manhood for my lousy thirty bucks. I’m just trying to find out what the norm is. When I was in my teens, I could come a couple of times an hour all day long, and thank you for the chance. But I don’t know if most of these guys are wired that way or not. And I’d hate to drop a couple of bills learning that it rarely happens, or is often faked. Another question is how the communication works. I think I’ve seen reviews where the client said he was talking to the model, as in two-way sound. Or did he mean talking via his keyboard? And what’s the video like? Just lurking, I see a three-inch window, with maybe a couple of frames a second. In a private, would it be full-screen with a decent frame rate? Does the model play up to the camera, or is it a static wide shot? And finally, what about the reviews on the model’s bio pages? I rarely see one without five-out-of-five stars and effusive praise. Do you think the reviewers’ standards are as high as those of our members here? And has a Flirt 4 Free model review ever been done on this site? And would anybody besides me like to see reviews here for some of these hotties? Like maybe one for Juanjose V?

Bewitched by the ass shot, and hoping for the best, Professor Dumbledore conjures up the Crack of Doom.

I agree that watersports can definitely increase the pleasure of an intimate encounter, although mine have not yet been with our four-legged friends - the lone exception being a recent afternoon with Rick and Derek. Horse shit, while largely uncharted territory for me as well, does seem to bring us back on topic, consistent with the original thrust of the thread.

Dear? Why do I get the feeling I should be hiding my purse?

Actually, I did get fairly good at that one last June while waiting for a stall at the Minneapolis airport. Sweet dreams!

I'm not so much for the real kinky stuff but hey we're all here to learn . . .

Not darkness, certainly, but a bit of the luster is gone for me. I did try clicking on a few thumbnails, only to be told I’m not worthy; and, as surmised in my earlier post, it did piss me off a little. Seems like a site which relies on viewers for content, both for reviews and in the message center, would think twice before charging them to view pictures freely provided by escorts hoping to be seen in all their sizable glory. But that’s just my take, and I’m not even an Aroused Member yet, let alone Tumescent, so what do I know? The good news is I’ve got more time to practice my fouettés. Look, I’m up to eight now, and it’s only been a day! Can a grand jeté be far behind?

Once again, Wikipedia to the rescue.

Love it! Don’t know Latin, so had to look it up. "She is tossed by the waves, but is not sunk" From Wikipedia: "This phrase is the motto of Paris, and is present in the city coat of arms depicting a ship floating on a rough sea. Both motto and city arms have their origins in the Seine River boatsman's corporation; this powerful hanse ruled the city's trade and commerce as early as the Roman era. Although this corporation through the centuries became an entity resembling more a municipal government than a trade organisation, they maintained their original arms and motto, and it is for this that the Mairie de Paris bears them still today." Many thanks for this gem!

We'll get right on it! And thanks so much for keeping the big pictures turned on over the weekend. We'd hate to kill off the wrong guy.

Funny! The bigger photos, in turn, allowing the user to enlarge his laptop. Which will be quite a charge for this user, at any rate, and well worth the wait.

They'll probably have LED backlights too, longer battery life and, dare I hope, an HDMI port!

I might, and have, if I like the guy from his reviews and/or posts, and if the picture looks good. But here you caught me being lazy, using Daddy’s review site as my only example of a larger picture. I had also taken a shot at including David's Rentboy pictures in my last post so you could see what they look like too, but was told that dynamic links aren't supported, whatever the hell they are. However, if you’ll click the following Rentboy link, you’ll see a half dozen larger pictures of David, just about any one of which would get me to pick up the phone. http://www.rentboy.com/location/getrb.asp?...amp;Location=71 MER has been a great combo site with reviews and good pictures, when the guy I'm interested in is here. I usually check Daddy's site for reviews too and, after next week, Rentboy will be the place I'll check for more full-size pictures. MER will remain a good one-stop solution for paying members, but probably not for me, as the little thumbnails don't show up very well on my screen. Sorry for the puzzlement, and hope this clears it up OK.

I think Happy makes a number of very good points. One of the escorts I’m hoping to hook up with in the near future is David in San Francisco. He’s posted a few times on Daddy’s website and comes across as a really nice guy. Shallow as I am, I did want to check out his pictures before getting in touch with him. Fortunately, his pictures are on a number of websites, and are easy to find. He is definitely hot! Today, I’m likely to look for David’s pictures on this website, but that will change after December 15th, when I’ll be limited to viewing only thumbnails. It makes a difference, as you can see. Here’s David’s picture from Daddy’s Reviews today: Here’s David’s picture from this site today: And here’s David’s picture from this site as of December 15th: It's possible this site will become less popular with escorts as well as clients, once only paying members can see pictures large enough to make a hiring decision. Of course, you'll be able to see any change in traffic pretty quickly, and may decide to reverse course. But then I wonder how you'll get any lost traffic back again, without spending more money. I’m sure you’ve run the numbers before making the decision to charge for enlarging pictures. But, based on the feedback you’ve read here, I hope you’ll consider running the numbers one more time before the change is made. (This post provided to MER by Lookin at no charge.) (And as you so accurately pointed out, it's cheap at twice the price!!)

And here I thought I'd have to go to the other site to get my member deracinated. Or tarradiddled for that matter. Your post alone is worth the price of admission! (This post provided to MER by Lookin at no charge!) (And cheap at twice the price!!)

I appreciate flguy’s starting this thread, as I rarely visit the home page and would have missed it altogether. Here’s some input from a free member who’s been getting a free ride on the Silver membership train, and appreciates it, but is not planning to upgrade on December 15th. It’s not that I begrudge you eight bucks a month. On the contrary, I’d be happy to buy you guys a drink every time I saw you. It’s just that I don’t join websites. I hate the idea of turning over my credit card info for a recurring charge every month. An old-fashioned bugaboo of mine, I know, but there you have it. After I’m downgraded on December 15th, the one thing I’ll miss is being able to enlarge pictures. I don’t do it very often, but once in a while I like a closer look. Along with posting in the forums from time to time, it’s really the only reason for me to even log in. I visit the forums and Flirt4Free most every day, and have fun posting once in a while, but usually just show up as a guest. I can’t say for sure but my guess is that the first time I try to enlarge a picture and am told I don’t have sufficient privileges, it will probably piss me off a little. Not a great deal, but it will probably feel a bit like a punch in the nose. After the second or third time of being reminded I’m out of the club, it will probably keep me from stopping by the site as much. I’m very clear that you folks have business decisions to make, and I’m certainly not the kind of site visitor that’s central to your business plan. But I did want you to know what my thinking is, so you’d at least have one more piece of info as you go forward. It remains my hope that you’ll be able to make ends meet from advertising revenues alone, and not need to charge for enlarging pictures. But I understand and respect whatever decisions you make, and wish you the very best! Thanks again for the good times!

Funny! Sounds like an interesting movie. Thanks for mentioning it. I've always loved John Leguizamo. And Benjamin Bratt. But hadn't heard of Unax Ugalde before. Woof!

Hope the folks in front of you had their galoshes on . . .

Interesting question. But you posed it two different ways so, for me, it has two different answers. In your first post, you wrote: And in that case, I’d say “Sure would!†There are lots of fantasy guys I’d love to give a warm oral welcome to, including Matt Damon. Then in your second post you wrote: And in that case, I’d have to say “No way.†There’s nothing that turns me off faster than a bad attitude. It’s not that I’d be cutting off my nose to spite my face, so to speak. It’s just that, for me, certain negative personal characteristics completely extinguish the flame of desire. Mel Gibson’s dick before he opened his mouth was something I could see getting friendly with; but after he started sharing all his personal views, any erotic charge just fizzled out for me. I think that's one of the reasons many celebrities put so much effort into crafting their public images. And one of the reasons glory holes have been so popular throughout the ages.

Welcome Foxy, congratulations to you all, and many thanks for doing the right thing. I'll keep this short, owing to the difficulty of typing with open arms.

Not that I'm haunting the place or anything, but I just noticed a couple of new guys on the Top Boys website. Douglas: and Felipe: Keep this up and Dolores won't be the only one flying down to Rio!

Those damned witches, queers, and Hillary, And all of that liberal frillery, Just add to the drama Of Barack Obama. Let's trundle them off to the pillory! - Fox Anchors’ Requisite Training Manual (FARTMAN)

Yes, this one is going to make me buy a new laptop.

You may very well be right. It will be interesting to see if the Senate Ethics Committee builds a mock-up of the Minneapolis-St. Paul airport stalls, just to show how it’s done. I’ve been practicing my footwork, in case they need an expert witness. http://apnews.excite.com/article/20071004/D8S2LR3O0.html Craig Vows to Stay Despite Court Loss Oct 4, 5:37 PM (ET) WASHINGTON (AP) - Idaho Sen. Larry Craig defiantly vowed to serve out his term in office on Thursday despite losing a court attempt to rescind his guilty plea in a men's room sex sting. "I have seen that it is possible for me to work here effectively," Craig said in a written statement certain to disappoint fellow Republicans who have long urged him to step down. . . . Craig's decision to stay and fight raises the strong possibility of public hearings - virtually certain to be televised live - centered on the issue of gay sex. . . . Craig says his actions in the Minneapolis-St. Paul International Airport bathroom June 11 were misconstrued by the police officer who arrested him. The officer said Craig had looked into his bathroom stall, and tapped his foot and moved his hand under the divider in a way that suggested he was looking for a sexual partner. Craig denied that in an interview with the officer after his arrest. . . .