Lucky

Well, suck, you will notice that I didn't thank myself here! I am aware that my vote won't count, but someone had to get the action rolling! Here's the rule. Note the word "others": 2. Wait for Others to Vote by "liking" the photo.

My thanks go out to those here who have posted a "like" for one or more of my 13 cocksucking photos that I have so far entered into the contest. 8 members have "liked" one or more of my photos, and I want them to know that I appreciate it. So, thanks to: Totally Oz, Adam Smith, numerito, planetime, bertj, EXPAT, Axiom, and MsGuy. Here is a private pic just for you guys! No one else can look!

Thanks for the report. I'd be interested to know how the dictatorship has affected gay life, if at all.

Does not the starch in a potato convert to sugar in the body, thus causing calories and problems for diabetics?

I guess JSONE will have to find a new topic besides Daddys!

None of them have a dick!

Okay, Mr. Oz, I watched that trailer and then read the link. The trailer itself was not encouraging in terms of making me want to see the movie. but the link went even further: "It's a pretty trying movie to watch, though it does have some striking images. The main character is a film director named Emiliano (Hugo Catalan), who seems to specialize in dance films with a sideline in hardcore sex films. He's restless and uninterested in a serious relationship, though he becomes fixated on a gifted dancer named Octavio (Alan Ramirez). But his phobia of commitment puts the kibosh on that promising liaison. Actually, that summary makes the film sound more coherent than it is. The movie begins by suggesting that Octavio may be the main character, but he disappears for a long stretch while Emiliano films a sexual encounter of two men and a woman. This film-within-a-film seems interminable and has only a marginal connection to the main characters. Emiliano also takes up with a hustler before reconnecting briefly with Octavio at the end. During all these scenes, it's hard to feel anything for the self-absorbed Emiliano, and the other characters appear too infrequently to register strongly. Publicity has compared this movie to other films about filmmaking like 8 1/2 and Contempt, but those had more compelling actors as well as more piquant insights into the filmmaking circus. What makes Happiness intermittently watchable is the color scheme. Hernandez has an eye for arresting compositions. The set design is intriguing, and even the clothes are thoughtfully chosen. But it's hard to recommend a movie in order to appreciate a turquoise T-shirt or the green tiles in a bathroom. The best scenes are the dance sequences, which capture the tactile sense of bodies in motion. Ramirez seems to be a genuinely gifted dancer, and his body is lovingly photographed as he glides through his paces. Ramirez also gives the most appealing performance in the film, so it's a considerable letdown when he disappears for half the movie. The sexual interludes aren't erotic enough to make up for the absence of characterization, and the editing is almost maddeningly slow."

This is it!!! That's all there is...

Almost there...are you ready for it?

Still working on it...

I'm working on it.

Picture of Lucky chilling!

Well, then, this picture of him should be good for 60 seconds!

Will the new moderator be needing an instruction manual?

A gift for Adam Smith: http://xxxibsdrgn8.tumblr.com/

Yes, we is lucky to have a sand box!

He can't say a word as long as he remains banned. The "Esteemed member" title was given to him by the website Boytoy.com, not me. It does seem to me that if Oz felt he made a mistake, he should undo it and end the ban. Just my two cents. Here's a little present for Oz:

That's harsh!

It takes a good man to give a public apology when he is wrong, and Oz deserves credit for not remaining silent. Draker, however, is still banned according to the word under his user name: Banned.

Did someone say shoots?

Oh. As long as the law is being equally enforced!

The rules provided for banning a member were pretty restrictive. It didn't seem like anyone could be banned under them. But, I see that overnight Steven Draker has been banned. I haven't seen any reason for that. His intentions seemed to be good, and he has a history of posting interesting topics here. Whats more, he is/was the only escort actively posting here. Granted, he said some provocative things, and I did not always agree with him. But the only escort posting here gets banned. Does that send any signal to other escorts who might have hoped to post? Was there no other recourse? This site claims to have a tolerance for posters, and an esteemed poster who also escorts, who also posts frequently, would seem to be someone worth saving. Not many people get attacked as Steven did. That he might say something wrong in those circumstances seems to be expected. Banning seems extreme.

I nominate Suckrates and Adam Smith. Let those two fight it out! But, good wishes on your new adventure!

As part of the new Boytoy changes, all of Adam Smith's posts will emit a slight fart odor when clicked on, and his font will always be brown.