PeterRS

For every expert saying one thing, there is another saying the opposite! Im not going to touch a planes video screen unless I know it has been properly cleaned with alcohol before I get on board. Same with the arm rests, the seat bels and the tray table. Who knows who has been on that plane and near that seat when it arrived before my departure? I may sneeze into my sleeve or a tissue or handkerchief, but no one knows who has been in that seat or near it and failed to cover his or her mouth or nose, When I come to Thailand I will use alcohol wipes liberally on the plane. Im taking no chances https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/01/how-coronavirus-spreads-on-a-plane/

Sobering indeed. A key part of the article is surely this one. After SARS it was widely reported that another similar illness would eventually appear and that it would originate in China where animals and humans often exist in close proximity to each other. Early and continuing research is vital with all new illnesses. Lest we forget, researchers now believe the first known AIDS patient in the USA was a teenager Robert Rayford whose immune system was dysfunctional and who suffered from a number of highly unusual symptoms including Kaposi's syndrome. Rayford died in St. Louis in 1969. The autopsry results baffled doctors. It was only in 1988 that tests found HIV antibodies in his blood samples. How he was infected is not known. It is suspected that he could have been a child prostitute. St. Louis was TWA's international hub city. The case was so unusual it was the subject of an extensive 1973 article in the medical journal Lymphology. It is mere speculation but had research continued on Rayford's death, could the HIV pandemic have been nipped in the bud?

I take the CDCs guidelines and use the N95 for greater protection against the smaller droplets getting through the mask. This type of mask is not very comfortable to wear in the heat of Thailand . But the normal surgical mask is not effective is protecting against the smaller droplets named aerosols. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/npptl/pdfs/UnderstandDifferenceInfographic-508.pdf I agree there is so much advice in so many places it has all become very confusing.

Plenty. These masks do not fully cover the face. There are plenty of gaps at the sides and small gaps around the nose. Not difficult to breath only air that comes through the mask. The tight fitting N95 respirator masks are far more effective according to many medical websites.

The problem with almost all masks is they cover only the nose and mouth. A cough or a sneeze from an infected person near you releases small droplets into the air. These can just as easily infect you through your eyes. Short of wearing goggles I guess those weatring regular eye glasses have a slightly greater degree of protection. Other point is to avoid touching objects which may have been touched by an infected individual. Things like cash, elevator handrails, floor buttons on lifts etc. Always keep washing your hands.

Some years ago I did Brazil flying from Asia. Then it meant two 12 hour overnight flights with a long14 hour stopover in Europe. Thank goodness I had enough miles saved up to upgrade to biz class. With many more daytime flights to Europe now, the total trip time can be a lot shorter via cities like Dubai. Depending on where you live in Asia you can also consider flying via the Pacific. But total journey time will still be a bit more than 24 hours. Good luck! The trip is worth it.

In Bangkok you see lots of Indians in the main shopping malls. These ladies spend heavily judging by the luxury bags they carry.

There is lots to see in all three cities. Just check travel tips on the internet and youll get all the info you need on all the main ones. Dont forget take a half day trip to the Amber Fort outside Jaipur. Delhi has god awful traffic but there is a very basic underground network which can help get near some of the sights. Please do not miss Agra. Difficult to say when you will see it without much air pollution but it is definitely bucket list material. Try and see it at least twice - once just as dawn is breaking when the marble changes colour and then again during the day. Sorry cannot help with gay life other than gay sex was decriminalised earlier this year. It was very much AYOR for foreigners when I was there. I expect it will be much the same now.

I find it useless worrying about nomenclature. I for one hate the use of Queer. For decades when I was growing up it was filled with very negative connotations and I loathed it. Now it has become fashionable again. I wish the younger generation could be bothered to educate themselves about its history. Gay is one virtually generic term but there are many sub-terms. Even that is a fairly recent adoption of the term. In the years between the two world wars, it meant cheerful, carefree and fun. Even in the mid 1950s Leonard Bernstein composed a musical 'Candide' whose main song is "Glitter and be Gay". (Mind you, as Bernstein was himself a homosexual as his wife writes in one of her letters to him, its possible perhaps he wrote that with tongue in cheek!) In a way I am sorry the word gay has all but lost its earlier meanings. As for straights, I have no such problem. What other term is likely to be appropriate I wonder? Acceptance of the word heteros implies an equal acceptance of homos.

Thank you. I might check it out.

Where is this? Bangkok? Pattaya?

Guys, with the greatest respect, I think this tragedy is above petty nit-picking and word meanings. We all know what happened to those poor Vietnamese (and perhaps some Chinese) and how they found themselves in that situation. Lets have some respect for those who must have died in horrible circumstances. There is also a thread on this on Gay Asia. Maybe best to stick with that one. Just a thought.

This is a ghastly event, yet it is not the first time that people have died in the back of airless containers as they desperately tried to get into the UK. Its appalling to think that some families and loved ones coughed up around $40,000 to make the trip from Vietnam and are now may be in debt for years. There are reports that some of the traffickers are repaying families those costs. Fat lot of use that will be to families of have lost their young sons and daughters, and to the young wives and children left behind. We can only hope that a tragedy such as this will prevent others from trying to do the same. Unlikely, I fear.

Do Chinese women still account for much of the customer base?

One of the prime reasons THAI is failing is precisely because the government interferes far too often with the running of the airline. It replaces the Board Chairmen regularly, seemingly at whim, and makes often inexplicable decisions. As with many things in Thailand, part of the reason for the airline's decline is inevitably corruption. It used to have far too many different types of aircraft, no doubt because someone massively benefited from purchasing a batch of a certain aircraft even though not ideal for the route structure. Now it is down to about six different models and should be in a better position to become competitive. Yet its failure to sell its remaining 8 long-range A340s as soon as it ceased flying the transPacific routes was a massive mistake. Years after axing the routes, these aircraft sit idly by at two of the country's airports. Some group of people in THAI should have been fired years ago for allowing this to happen. Now the value of these planes has plummeted and they will soon be worth almost nothing. THAI desperately needs a makeover of all its front end cabins. Some aircraft have been refitted and its first and business class services can be excellent. The problem is that too many have not been retrofitted. Those who can afford the front end want the same competitive hard product but on THAI it is a lottery. Little wonder these passengers are deciding with their feet. Concentrating on some form of competition with low cost carriers is surely madness. THAI already has Thai Smile. Not sure if it still has its stake in Not Air which has also been hemorrhaging cash in recent years. With Hong Kong undergoing long-running protests, its tourism is collapsing. Equally it has one airline teetering on the verge of bankruptcy, Hong Kong Airlines, Cathay Pacific struggling with half full aircraft and Cathay Dragon, its subsidiary which serves many Chinese cities, probably in a worse state. Future transit passengers must surely be wary of booking on these airlines for who knows how many flights will be cancelled if the protests continue. If I found myself with what was scheduled as a 90 minute layover suddenly facing one of 5 hours or even overnight, I would be mightily pissed off. For those who would normally transit in Hong Kong, THAI and BKK should be aggressively marketing themselves as the sensible alternative. If they are, I am not aware of it.

The Bangkok route was announced as a possibility in the Bangkok Post a couple of days ago. But that price is not London/Bangkok or vice versa - it is Kuwait (the airline's 'home base) to London. It adds Jazeera has no A321's in its fleet at present and none yet on order. Jazeera's route map has no destinations east of India. https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/1755754/kuwait-budget-airline-to-use-short-haul-jets-on-london-bangkok-route

Every month they have delayed selling them, the value of their fleet has dropped quite dramatically. This information is dated August 2018 http://www.aircraftvaluenews.com/aircraft-market-assessment-13/ The list price of a new A340-500 was $261 million. The present resale value of a 1997 long-range A340 is estimated at US$9 million. Go figure! Another THAI disaster.

Apologies - in my previous post when referring to ETOPS I stated specific numbers of hours. It should have been minutes!

The reason for the suspension was more simple. Like Singapore Airlines, THAI took a bet that the four engine Airbus A340 designed in the mid-1990s was the right plane for both their Los Angeles and New York routes. Under the old ETOPS rules (Extended Operations - usually over water). airline routes were required to have alternate airports not more than 120 hours and some years later 180 hours flying time away in the event that one engine became inoperable. So twin engine aircraft were not possible over the Pacific. When SIA, THAI and others planned their transPacific non-stops and did not believe the market warranted the larger 744s, four engines were still essential for trans-Pacific routes. Thanks in large part to the success of the Boeing 777, the ETOPS range was extended first to 180 hours and then to 240 hours and more. This directive only came into operation in 2007. By that time SIA and THAI were flying their less efficient more gas guzzling A340s and having trouble making them profitable. Besides, oil prices were starting to rise substantially. THAI consistently sold 80% of its seats on the New York route, but to be profitable would have had to sell 120%!! So both airlines quit the routes. Airbus then stopped making the plane in 2011. SIA has now restarted Singapore to Newark with the new ultra long range A350s but only with business and premium economy cabins. At least SIA was able to get Airbus to take back its A340s. Someone screwed up at THAI and the airline still has 9 of the 10 it purchased but never uses them. It tried for years to sell them but no operator wanted them! I believe they are all grounded at Don Mueang and U-tapao. If thats true, I reckon the airline would be better off selling them for scrap.

What I dont understand is why BA ditched the continuation of its BKK flight on to Sydney. Flights were always packed in all sectors. Even if you tried to get a business class miles ticket more than 6 months ahead it was almost always impossible.

Having taken BA from LHR to BKK and back, I will never fly them again. The ageing 777s they use on this route should soon be due for the scrapyard. The cabin was dirty, the seats very uncomfortable, food mediocre and service - well, nowhere else would it be called service! Once one of the best in the world, BA is now worse than most low cost carriers.

I once used the BBC Weather site. On a visit to Taipei, the forecast was for bright sunshine and little cloud. Looking out of my hotel room window, I was watching lashing rain, howling winds and broken branches flying through the air as a typhoon zipped through! I then switched to the Weather Channel. Not as bad, but also virtually useless for forecasts longer than one day ahead. When I travel I usually check the 10 day forecast at least to give me an idea of what the weather may be like. Most times it has not been anything close to accurate. If I want to check what might happen in the next two hours, I just look at the sky. That's usually pretty accurate.

As far as I recall Akha Ama Coffee is only sold in their own two coffee shops, ini in the old city. The founder of the coffee company appeared in a TED video a few years ago. He is truly inspirational.

Not at all! I turned up at BKK a year or so ago and realised I had lost the outbound part of the TM form. I spoke to an Immigration officer who said it was no problem. He then just handed me another form to fill out. No fuss. No fine.

I will go if only to experience the Doi Tung Coffee. This is from the Coffee sites main page - I have tasted another hill tribe coffee, Akha Ama Coffee, in Chiang Mai and loved it.