Moses

New review on Siamroads service: Mac's profile is here https://siamroads.com/mac/

New review on Siamroads service in Ho Chi Minh (Saigon): Will's profile is here: https://siamroads.com/will-tour-guide-and-companion-ho-chi-minh-vietnam/

Sure. Сognition comes through comparison.

No. Blued was #1 if you are in twinks, due COVID it failed down because it is primary Chinese app. But at past Feb in Thailand and Vietnam I found what it is back again and is the same populated as Hornet. Hornet and Blued should be your choice if you are in bottom boys below 30 yo. Grindr should be your choice if you are in older 30+ guys, mostly tops. Drawback of Blued is habit of users to use avatars without their real faces. Most avatars in Blued are generic pictures even when they are portraits. So for to know who is behind such avatar you should ask for real pics.

That's nice. You have nothing to say about paradox situation when US should choose btw Clown and Zombie to which gerontocracy pushed country, and switching discussion to KGB. Well, I knew - there is nothing right and acceptable in choice one of 2 "worst cases"

I just wonder: why US should choose btw 2 worst "cases" - Orange Clown and Walking Dead Alzheimer?

Could you please quote me where I'm talking about "respect"?

Why you call country of gerontocrats "democracy"? Without cards with speech Biden is able to say only 3 sentences: "Who I am?" "Where I am?" and "Who are you?".

You will destroy your country even more if current Mr. Alzheimer Mr. President, will take oval room again. And now I'm talking not about Trump.

Don't tell me what I should do, and will not tell you to where you should proceed with all your wishes... Please find in my posts any "normalizing" of Trump. I'm speaking about titles for presidents. What is correct and what is not.

It is not about Trump, it is about respect of the will of nation elected him as a president. It is foundation of democracy, do you know?

No. "President Trump" is correct because of lifetime presidential privilege. Moderator may use both: "Mr. Trump" and "President Trump". "Mr. President" isn't correct since it is privilege of acting president.

It isn't correct. "Once President = forever President" - it is presidential privilege. So "President Trump" is correct. Does First amendment still exist in US? If so, why so many words about appearance of candidate to take POTUS's chair on TV?

There are some more tricks for to save money when you are booking via internet: don't use iPhone and Apple computers, don't use Chrome browser, use VPN from less developed country and may additionally save up to 30%. For example: just two different browsers: Opera and Chrome.

What we reading here: - ethnic rebel group - Karen National Liberation Army - attacked two military-backed Border Guard Force (BGF) strongholds - as result Intense violence displaced thousands of residents in Myanmar who took little to no belongings with them as they either boarded boats or waded through waist-deep water to cross the river into Thailand So question: Why here is mentioned "junta"? "Rebels" Karen National Liberation Army - radical nationalistic movement with terroristic methods existed since 1949 (hello UK, it is result of your ruling in Burma, KNLA has roots in formerly army officers of British Burma). KNLA attacks state army since 1949. With junta on the top of country or with civilian govt, KNLA attacks anyway.

The whole article looks like virus advertising of 79 Adult show.

So, who really "seem"?

Could you please point me on word "Putin" in my posts. "Putin" is in your head, but you trying to pretend what "You seem". In my posts I'm speaking about Myanmar.

I never wrote "let's turn history back to past". I wrote: it is time to UK to accept and declare own actions as mistakes and pay for it: firstly - with apologies and accepting responsibility, secondly - fix it by financial aid and by resolving problem. Burmese will never forget them (Rohingya) tens of thousands of killed Buddhists at past. In modern tensions even Nobel prize's for peace winner - Aung San Suu Kyi - took side of Myanmar govt in crisis. Because all Burmese remember history. Their own history.

Romans don't exists anymore, while UK sill exists, and the same family rules UK what created crisis during First Anglo-Burmese war. So, I think it will be right step for UK to accept responsibility for moving Rohingya to Arakan state in 19 сentury as a the first step, and resolve crisis in moving them back to Bengal state or to UK as a second step.

Lets not forget what "Rohingya crisis" has been created and then carefully cooked by British empire in First Anglo-Burmese War.

Do you want to discuss one-party-system in Laos or Vietnam? Or maybe absolute monarchies without any party like Brunei, Oman, Saudi Arabia, Vatican City, and the individual emirates composing the United Arab Emirates?

I just want to remind: people in disorders in Capitolium were named "terrorists" for much less actions, than do some Myanmar fractions...

this is even below $50.000 well, when party supports terror it shouldn't' be represented in legal organizations and parliament

Exactly that I told. By mandate ICC should be sponsored by members. But EC EU paid to ICC. That I call bribe.