Leaderboard

Or he pulled a gaffer

That's better

http://thehill.com/homenews/news/361998-fcc-chairman-stop-harassing-my-family-over-net-neutrality

I have never seen an aviation movie without errors, usually serious errors. Airplane is an exception in this regard. NOTHING in it is accurate. Best regards, RA1

I only occasionally stick my head into this site, even though I was one of the first members here. I am just now seeing this for the first time and I am deeply saddened by this horrible news. My thoughts and prayers are for his family and close friends, many of them here. May he Rest in Peace.

Eh. we all have our tastes. Lucky may be different from the rest of us.

If people got diseases from giving head every cheerleader would be dead.

How sweet. I'm definitely no scientist, but I do have a curious mind I have played one on TV. Not sure what Lucky's issue is with Photoshop and cock. He's had the issue for a long time. Photoshop is just a modern artist's tool. Considering Lucky's appreciation for some of the Arts, he may be burdened by selective appreciation. I remember a well-known escort who didn't like my enhanced cock images over at Hooville. Maybe bigger cocks made his look smaller? I've stopped trying to figure out the pathos of certain escorts. Most people know little about the science of photography, yet everyone with an i-Phone thinks they're a photographer these days. These ignorant folk wrongly believe that a camera can see as the human eye sees. Nothing could be further from the truth. A camera is always distorting the truth. A camera can only capture "reality" with serious limitations. Another falsehood is the belief that Photoshop means "fake" or "retouched." It certainly can mean those things. However, in the realm of digital, every digital file (image) requires some kind of processing or editing in order to produce a finished image. Some cameras (in Auto mode) do the processing work for the user, but almost all professionals prefer to use professional modes and tools to bring a digital image to life. And if you decide to print a professional image, the need for post processing software, such as Photoshop, becomes even more crucial. I expected more brain from Lucky. I hear as we age, we get more set in our lazy ways.

He is very cute!

If you bothered to take the time to learn the science behind camera lenses, you might find out that lens glass is spherical, therefore, it distorts the subject by default. Depending on the length of the lens, rarely, and I do mean rarely, does any photo tell the precise truth about the cock in a photo. The only way to "accept the dick that the guy has," you have to hire the guy and see the cock in person. In most cases, a photo of a cock is pure fantasy because of the science of photography. This might explain why Al Parker was famous for telling his fans "blame my cock size on the cameraman." And that's before Photoshop. Lighting and camera angles make a difference, too. It's the same reason why a lot of people don't look like their photos when met in person. Or, a pro model looks ordinary in person but looks extraordinary in photos. Either the science works or it doesn't. Many would argue, and I would agree, that Photoshop in porn is necessary to get closer to the truth. The chances of getting the cock, the face, and the body muscles all in the right place at the right time is VERY challenging and time consuming. In a porn photo shoot, 9 times out of 10 the face and the body will be perfectly composed, but the cock will have drooped. In digital, it is very easy to replace the droopy dick with the one that's full-mast from another frame. Why settle for half-mast if you don't have to? For the sake of believability, the key is to hire someone who knows what he is doing. On top of all this, entertainment is the point, especially if I have to entertain myself.