Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 11/24/2017 in all areas
-
I agree with Bobbolino regarding the inaccuracy about Fortaleza! If you read the article on Pointe Sauna in Rio it has photos showing the small sauna in Botofugo that Junior had for a short time after selling Pointe but the article says the photos are Pointe202! so accuracy doesn't seem to be a overriding concern! their article on Porto Alegre is even worse as far as where to go!! " The restrooms at Praca de Alfandega, a public part near the center of town. The shopping center on Rua de Praia. This is just next door to the Praca; you can often cruise guys here and then head over to the park. Parque da Redencao. At night this park is full of rent boys who will be more than willing to take you into the bushes for a few minutes. Bourbon Assis Brasi. This shopping mall is also a hot cruising spot for those who like bathroom blow jobs. (And, really, if the boy toy is cute enough, who doesn’t?) Having been to all of these places except for the rest rooms in Praca de Alfandega(i value my life to much) I have never seen any action or got a hint of it in the Bourbon Mall which is like a large Target or Walmart! yet no mention of Mezziniu or Plataforma... b====1 point
-
It's Friday, November 24, 2017 at 11:05A.M. in California. I read the title in the forward and thought it was a joke regarding Lurkerspeak's passing. ...went to www.gaythailand.com to read his previous posts about his first visit to "The Land of Smiles" and discovered that the "RIP..." was indeed real. Although I never had the pleasure of meeting Lurker in person-- I felt akin based on his posts here regarding Brasil and other posts. I am saddened, especially after reading about his anticipated visit to Thailand and the preparations that he had made. His death is oh so, so, so friggin' sad. We never know when or how we are going to leave this earth. Death is a mystery; it's so damn scary, too! May this gentleman rest in eternal peace. He will be missed.1 point
-
RIP Lurkerspeaks
AdamSmith reacted to TownsendPLocke for a topic
I spoke with LurkerSpeaks sister the other day. It was a difficult conversation for both of us. I had to use discretion, diplomacy and compassion all at the same time. There is a police investigation happening since there was another person (a young Thai male) in the room when LurkerSpeaks passed. I am pretty sure that this fella just happened to be in the wrong space at the wrong time when LurkerSpeaks died of natural causes and unfortunately some prescription medications were removed from his hotel room. .Ifhear otherwise I will post it here. LurkerSpeaks body was cremated in Thailand and will be returned to his family along with his personal effects.1 point -
Demonstrations available at no charge. Viewer participation required.1 point
-
Happy Thanksgiving?
Latbear4blk reacted to AdamSmith for a topic
It functions very well! ...in all its fit functions.1 point -
1 point
-
LOL...You lost me at "little pink white ass."1 point
-
Happy Thanksgiving?
Latbear4blk reacted to AdamSmith for a topic
Stay alive! We need you. One of the most VITAL posters on both forums. Your perspective and outlook have been long treasured. Certainly by me, and I know by many others.1 point -
Happy Thanksgiving?
Latbear4blk reacted to OneFinger for a topic
Good health insurance provided by my company AT NO COST TO ME!! Unfortunately, since be assigned to a project in San Diego (almost 3 years ago), I've been hospitalized twice and in the ER 3 times. Without fantastic health care I'd be broke now. Would love to retire but the only thing keeping working is the heath care issue. Can't afford to purchase my own health care so I'm tied to a very stressful job. Not a good situation. Can't wait until I turn 65 in April and am eligible for Medicare. My plans are to retire after that and take control of my life again.1 point -
Happy Thanksgiving?
AdamSmith reacted to RockHardNYC for a topic
So happy to hear I may be stimulating your, er, brain.1 point -
1 point
-
Hammurabi became ruler of Babylon in 1792 BC and held the position for 43 years. In the era of city-states, Hammurabi grew his modest kingdom (somewhere between 60 and 160 square kilometers) by conquering several neighboring states. Satisfied, then, with the size of the area he controlled, Hammurabi settled down to rule his people. “This world of ours appears to be separated by a slight and precarious margin of safety from a most singular and unexpected danger.” — Arthur Conan Doyle Hammurabi was a fair leader and concerned with the well-being of his people. He transformed the area, ordering the construction of irrigation ditches to improve agricultural productivity, as well as supplying cities with protective walls and fortresses. Hammurabi also renovated temples and religious sites. By today’s standards, Hammurabi was a dictator. Far from abusing his power, however, he considered himself the “shepherd” of his people. Although the Babylonians kept slaves, they too had rights. Slaves could marry other people of any status, start businesses, and purchase their freedom, and they were protected from mistreatment. At first glance, it might seem as if we have little to learn from Hammurabi. I mean, why bother learning about the ancient Babylonians? They were just barbaric farmers, right? It seems we’re not as different as it appears. Our modern beliefs are not separate from those of people in Hammurabi’s time; they are a continuation of them. Early legal codes are the ancestors of the ones we now put our faith in. Whether a country is a dictatorship or democracy, one of the keys to any effective legal system is the ability for anyone to understand its laws. We’re showing cracks in ours and we can learn from the simplicity of Hammurabi’s Code, which concerned itself with practical justice and not lofty principles. To even call it a set of laws is misleading. The ancient Babylonians did not appear to have an equivalent term. Three important concepts are implicit in Hammurabi’s Code: reciprocity, accountability, and incentives. We have no figures for how often Babylonian houses fell down before and after the implementation of the Code. We have no idea how many (if any) people were put to death as a result of failing to adhere to Hammurabi’s construction laws. But we do know that human self-preservation instincts are strong. More than strong, they underlie most of our behavior. Wanting to avoid death is the most powerful incentive we have. If we assume that people felt and thought the same way 4000 years ago, we can guess at the impact of the Code. Imagine yourself as a Babylonian builder. Each time you construct a house, there is a risk it will collapse if you make any mistakes. So, what do you do? You allow for the widest possible margin of safety. You plan for any potential risks. You don’t cut corners or try to save a little bit of money. No matter what, you are not going to allow any known flaws in the construction. It wouldn’t be worth it. You want to walk away certain that the house is solid. Now contrast that with modern engineers or builders. They don’t have much skin in the game. The worst they face if they cause a death is a fine. We saw this in Hurricane Katrina —1600 people died due to flooding caused in part by the poor design of hurricane protection systems in New Orleans. Hindsight analysis showed that the city’s floodwalls, levees, pumps, and gates were ill designed and maintained. The death toll was worse than it would otherwise have been. And yet, no one was held accountable. Hurricane Katrina is regarded as a disaster that was part natural and part man-made. In recent months, in the Grenfell Tower fire in London, we saw the effects of negligent construction. At least 80 people died in a blaze that is believed to have started accidentally but that, according to expert analysis, was accelerated by the conscious use of cheap building materials that had failed safety tests. The portions of Hammurabi’s Code that deal with construction laws, as brutal as they are (and as uncertain as we are of their short-term effects) illustrate an important concept: margins of safety. When we construct a system, ensuring that it can handle the expected pressures is insufficient. A Babylonian builder would not have been content to make a house that was strong enough to handle just the anticipated stressors. A single Black Swan event — such as abnormal weather — could cause its collapse and in turn the builder’s own death, so builders had to allow for a generous margin of safety. The larger the better. In 59 mph winds, we do not want to be in a house built to withstand 60 mph winds. But our current financial systems do not incentivize people to create wide margins of safety. Instead, they do the opposite — they encourage dangerous risk-taking. Nassim Taleb referred to Hammurabi’s Code in a New York Times opinion piece in which he described a way to prevent bankers from threatening the public well-being. His solution? Stop offering bonuses for the risky behavior of people who will not be the ones paying the price if the outcome is bad. Taleb wrote: …it’s time for a fundamental reform: Any person who works for a company that, regardless of its current financial health, would require a taxpayer-financed bailout if it failed should not get a bonus, ever. In fact, all pay at systemically important financial institutions — big banks, but also some insurance companies and even huge hedge funds — should be strictly regulated. The issue, in Taleb’s opinion, is not the usual complaint of income inequality or overpay. Instead, he views bonuses as asymmetric incentives. They reward risks but do not punish the subsequent mistakes that cause “hidden risks to accumulate in the financial system and become a catalyst for disaster.” It’s a case of “heads, I win; tails, you lose.” Bonuses encourage bankers to ignore the potential for Black Swan events, with the 2008 financial crisis being a prime (or rather, subprime) example. Rather than ignoring these events, banks should seek to minimize the harm caused. Some career fields have a strict system of incentives and disincentives, both official and unofficial. Doctors get promotions and respect if they do their jobs well, and risk heavy penalties for medical malpractice. With the exception of experiments in which patients are fully informed of and consent to the risks, doctors don’t get a free pass for taking risks that cause harm to patients. The same goes for military and security personnel. As Taleb wrote, “we trust the military and homeland security personnel with our lives, yet we don’t give them lavish bonuses. They get promotions and the honor of a job well done if they succeed, and the severe disincentive of shame if they fail.” Hammurabi and his advisors were unconcerned with complex laws and legalese. Instead, they wanted the Code to produce results and to be understandable by everyone. And Hammurabi understood how incentives work — a lesson we’d be well served to learn. When you align incentives of everyone in both positive and negative ways, you create a system that takes care of itself. Taleb describes Law 229 of Hammurabi’s Code as “the best risk-management rule ever.” Although barbaric to modern eyes, it took into account certain truisms. Builders typically know more about construction than their clients do and can take shortcuts in ways that aren’t obvious. After completing construction, a builder can walk away with a little extra profit, while the hapless client is unknowingly left with an unsafe house. The little extra profit that builders can generate is analogous to the bonus system in some of today’s industries. It rewards those who take unwise risks, trick their customers, and harm other people for their own benefit. Hammurabi’s system had the opposite effect; it united the interests of the person getting paid and the person paying. Rather than the builder being motivated to earn as much profit as possible and the homeowner being motivated to get a safe house, they both shared the latter goal. The Code illustrates the efficacy of using self-preservation as an incentive. We feel safer in airplanes that are flown by a person and not by a machine because, in part, we believe that pilots want to protect their own lives along with ours. When we lack an incentive to protect ourselves, we are far more likely to risk the safety of other people. This is why bankers are willing to harm their customers if it means the bankers get substantial bonuses. And why male doctors prescribed contraceptive pills to millions of female patients in the 1960s, without informing them of the risks (which were high at the time). This is why companies that market harmful products, such as fast food and tobacco, are content to play down the risks. Or why the British initiative to reduce the population of Indian cobras by compensating those who caught the snakes had the opposite effect. Or why Wells Fargo employees opened millions of fake accounts to reach sales targets. Incentives backfire when there are no negative consequences for those who exploit them. External incentives are based on extrinsic motivation, which easily goes awry. When we have real skin in the game—when we have upsides and downsides—we care about outcomes in a way that we wouldn’t otherwise. We act in a different way. We take our time. We use second-order thinking and inversion. We look for evidence or a way to disprove it. Four thousand years ago, the Babylonians understood the power of incentives, yet we seem to have since forgotten about the flaws in human nature that make it difficult to resist temptation. https://www.farnamstreetblog.com/2017/11/hammurabis-code/ Interesting read...1 point
-
Happy Thanksgiving?
AdamSmith reacted to Latbear4blk for a topic
My love for weed does not leave any room for other addictions, so I have not succumbed to the charms of alcohol. Let me light a joint, give a poof to my water pipe, and take a bite of my loaded brownies to say: I am thankful of @AdamSmith and @RockHardNYC and @TotallyOz and everyone else who keeps my brain interested in visiting this forum.1 point -
1 point
-
Fortaleza, Brazil
Alaskabear reacted to demedici for a topic
Dragon is a huge shame - it is a fantastic facility but consistently disappoints in terms of the number of visitors, both GPs and customers. I was there two years ago and went three times but only saw about ten people total on Fri and Sat nights. I hoped that was just my experience. My favorite is the deck up above the pool, you get some great breezes and the ambience overall is really terrific.1 point -
God bless everyone, and hope y'all have a fantastic Thanksgiving, because when all is said and done, if we are vertical this morning, then we have much to be thankful for. Cheers, MsAnn1 point
-
WED: NDD4 (Point 202) vs 117? Help!
SolaceSoul reacted to Gotti for a topic
There is a consensus on this forum that Wednesday night is a 202 night in Rio, if you are not experienced don't go against the tide! Don't be fooled by "the strip night" gimmick, every night is a strip night in Rio. Strippers and drag-queens, you just can't escape them!1 point -
1 point
-
A Photo?
BigK reacted to RockHardNYC for a topic
Bel Ami's Jack Harrer. One of my all-time favorite boy toys. Here he is with slight RH enhancement. A gift to all my size queen fans. Happy Holidays!1 point -
There are entire websites dedicated to escort reviews. There are hundreds of people who are writing reviews, thousands reading them, and several people actually maintaining the sites that displays reviews. So Obviously they are useful to many people. If YOU don’t find them useful, fine, don’t write any and don’t read them. But dissing people who are asking “where can I find reviews” like @moonwalkerseems either unhelpful, or clueless about how most advanced clients operate when choosing an escort.1 point
-
Reviews of Online Rio Escorts
floridarob reacted to scott456 for a topic
Yes, sauna cost R100 per 40 minute session, but you need to add the entrance fee and the room charge. The total is close to R200. But the rooms at sauna are usually not nice (compare to a hotel room). The plus side with sauna is you see the guy in person before you decide if you want him, as opposed to online photos.1 point -
It's very sad news. As a man who's older than he but in good health, it shocks me that he's dead at 56. I wonder if pneumonia was the cause.1 point
-
So very sorry to hear of his passing. His posts were some of my favorites. When I travel outside the USA I make sure to have travel insurance. It usually covers much more than airline / hotel issues. The policies I get include emergency health care and bringing the remains back to the USA in the unfortunate event of my death.1 point
-
I did not know him but, from what all of you who knew him say about him, he much have been a great guy.1 point
-
1 point
-
This is terrible news. I only knew you through your posts but they did give me an sense that you were a good person. I hope you are not with 72 virgins, but with instead with 72 young but experienced hotties, as would be fitting for your status among us.1 point
-
RIP Lurkerspeaks. Your trip was to have concluded on your 57th birthday, and I know that you were looking forward to this for months. I am sorry to lose you and can only hope that you have found a Thai guy in the sky.1 point