Leaderboard

I think the open discussion forums, wherein advocates -- and also enemies -- of particular escorts can publicly air (afflatus ) and argue and counter-argue their experiences in seeing those escorts, are the most useful -- and self-correctingly truthful -- media available to us today. The 'vetting' done by, for example, daddy, I do not trust one inch. So to speak.

I do not know whether or not Daddy vets the reviews. I do know that at least he gives the escorts that get a negative feedback the chance to respond. If you check last week reviews you can see an example with Mr. Derek Atlas. That implies some degree of vetting. But perhaps you and @AdamSmith are right about how the times have changed. I think the value of Daddy's site is not given by the reviews or by the forums, but by the combination of both. Whether or not he vets the reviews, the actual vetting becomes a collaborative work through the threads in the forum, and through Private Messages. Those are actually my best resources when I am vetting a candidate to hire. Perhaps you are correct and it is a good idea to keep a thread or a page where we can freely post our reviews, and then discuss them in the forums.

The free and easy and large-volume flow of publicly submitted info in general public online fora, and the therefrom clearly visible patterns of truth vs deception, are what the Internet era are about. Your fill-in review info form constipates that free flow of info to the 9th degree.

This could be very good news for the market. They are also located in Amsterdam. I heard that there have been some changes going on in Rentmen's management. I wonder if a former employee or associate has gone amok.

Wholly agree. Filling out the form feels like being waterboarded. Make it a tenth as long! All those details, the important ones, will be in the guy's linked ad(s) anyway.