Leaderboard

The other day I mentioned that I had seen two supremely hot and sexy guys at the local Food4Less. This is a store with a large Hispanic patronage, but unfortunately the patrons come from a long line of farmers working hard at making a living in the hard sun. They don't win beauty contests, and they don't pass beauty genes on to their children. Except for the occassional mutation, such as those two hot guys. I had to get in another line that day so sexy was the one that I didn't trust myself. So today I saw yet another hottie. This guy was a teen, I wasn't sure how old, and he wore gym shorts that were full of meat in the rear. The front wasn't so obvious. I thought to myself: "I hope this guy is gay as girls will never appreciate that ass like guys will." And I sure appreciated that ass. I sw him several times in the store, and he noticed, even gving me a slight nod, probably for lack of information on what else he should do when an older white guy seems to notice him. We met up again in the parking lot, and this time I decided not to be shy. I don't live far from the store, and I don't know many young men who couldn't use some extra cash. So I smiled at him and apologized if I took too much notice of him. He smiled back and sort or waited for me to say more. I told him my thought about his hot ass- that gay guys would love it most. He smiled and said "sorry," he would then lose out since he was straight, and he even had a girl friend. Since he had yet to punch me, I asked him if she appreciated his ass like I did. He said he didn't know that I did, but he was quite sure that she liked his ass. "A bit," he said. He would ask her tomorrow night when they had their date. That's when I got bold. I said I could make sure he had some extra cash for that date, and he wouldn't have to do much to earn it. I invited him over, said he could shower privately, and then if he gave me 20 minutes with his ass, I'd give him $75. "No way you're fucking me for any amount of money," he said. "No, no, no," I said. All you have to do is lie on your belly and let me play with that naked butt. I can use my hands, my fingers, and my mouth, but you won't get fucked. You never even turn over." "Okay," he said after some awkward minutes. "I sure can use the money. But any funny business and I'll make you regret it." I replied, "You have no worries." On the five minute ride to my house, I ascertained his age (19), and learned that he had never touched a naked guy and didn't plan on touching me. But I did tell him that if he got turned on and wanted to cum, I'd pay another $25 for him to let me see him shoot. "Nah, that's too private," he said. So we got to the house, made the introductions to the dog, and I gave him a clean towel and showed him where the shower was. When he was done, just go lay on the bed, tummy down. If at any point you want to back out, okay, but no pay if we've started. When I entered the room, there it was- that glorious rump that makes a boy a man. He was brown all over, no tan line, and no hair in the hole. So I used my hands to check it out, felt the nice meaty texture, and yes, I peaked at his balls too. They were kind of hairy for a guy with no ass hair. I was really enjoying the tactile pleasure, but I had seen the moist pinky flesh in his hole and wanted to taste it. I felt the heat as I took a quick nibble or two to see if his definition of clean met mine- it did- and I proceeded to eat his ass in such a way that had him moaning and squirming. My tongue was in heaven and he was saying some words in Spanish that I did not know, but during one of his squirms I saw his hard cock glistening against the sheets. He turned and gave me a huge smile. "God, this feels good!" That's when I started penetrating his hot hole, ever so slightly at first, but he didn't complained, moaned even more, and I was soon entering him all the way. Okay, I was kind for the virgin- just one finger went in all the way! So, I asked him if he wanted that extra $25. I was sure he would say yes. But he didn't. On the way back to the store he told me that it would have been too gay. But he confessed that he came in the shower afterward, and I confessed that I did too. They were just not the same showers! Did you want to meet again, I asked? He said he would leave that to fate. He had never had such fun with his cock and ass, he told me, and he needed to process all that out. One thing I knew, I was sworn to silence. His friends were not to ever hear about this. (Not that I knew any of them!) But, I'll be looking for him everytime I want Food 4 Less. Rump roast is now my favorite.

The unraveling of Anthony Weiner Critics say the question at this point is just how delusional Weiner will get. | AP Photo By EDWARD-ISAAC DOVERE and MAGGIE HABERMAN | 7/30/13 5:13 PM EDT Updated: 7/31/13 1:49 PM EDT politico.com Anthony Weiner has lost his mind. At least, that’s the conclusion most Democrats have come to. There’s really no other way they can explain how he’s handled the revelations of his post-resignation sexts and his combative encounters with voters over the weekend looking for him to quit the mayor’s race. But Monday night’s needlessly dismissive brush off of the Clintons — the first family of Democratic politics who consider his wife a second daughter — surprised even people who thought they couldn’t be surprised anymore by his political self-destructiveness. And all for a campaign that’s plummeting in the polls and heading, with every passing hour, toward a seemingly more inevitable fiery end. The question at this point isn’t whether he’ll win or be able to use his 2013 campaign to purge memories of his 2011 humiliation. It’s just how defiant and, his critics argue, delusional, Weiner will get. He recently suggested, for example, that the latest sexting revelations, and whatever else may be coming, will actually benefit him in the race and once he gets to City Hall. “I’m going to be a successful mayor because of it,” he told the Staten Island Advance, “because it’s going to give me a level of independence.” Somewhat amazingly, he tried for sympathy about being betrayed by his online liaisons — people, Weiner told the Daily News, “who I thought were friends, people I trusted when I communicated with them.” But the topper may have been Monday night, when he made another unforced and flagrant foul. Responding to reports that associates of Bill and Hillary Clinton believe they want him out of the race, Weiner said the opinions of the man who gave Huma Abedin away to him at their wedding and his wife’s long-time boss — who also happen to be a former Democratic president and potentially future one — don’t matter to him because they live in Westchester. “I am not terribly interested in what people who are not voters in the city of New York have to say,” Weiner said, even as Abedin was in Washington staffing Hillary Clinton for her visits with President Barack Obama and Vice President Joe Biden. “He looks a guy who’s at the deep end of the pool and he really doesn’t know how to swim. For a guy whose whole reputation was how smart a political guy he was, how good he was on camera, how quick witted he was, this is part of the process of unraveling,” said Bill Cunningham, a former communications director for Mayor Mike Bloomberg. Weiner’s got two options, Cunningham said: Keep taking questions that prompt more incredible answers or refuse to speak about the scandal and get accused of going into hiding. “Either way,” Cunningham said, “he’s caught in this spiral.” Several Democrats who knew him when he was in Congress believe the recent display is who Weiner actually is — an unvarnished version, perhaps, stripped of the protection of a government office and membership to the Washington club, but the real Weiner nonetheless. “Remember, this is someone who thought he was unfairly pushed from office,” said one source, referring to the initial days of scandal in 2011, when he admitted to sending messages he’d initially claimed were the work of hackers. In private conversations with Democratic leadership at the time, Weiner defiantly insisted he shouldn’t have to quit, since he had broken no laws and his mistakes were personal failings, multiple sources said. His mantra then was “let the voters decide.” The mayoral campaign, and this last week in particular, have taken that to an extreme degree. “I think this is the real Anthony. … He saw himself as a contender,” said one veteran operative who knows Weiner. The problem now, the operative said, is not so much Weiner’s behavior as his “truthfulness” in describing it publicly. More than anything, even people who thought Weiner had a real shot at making a mayoral runoff have expressed surprise that he didn’t get everything out in the open in a New York Times magazine profile that effectively kicked off his campaign. Weiner’s every event now has a carnival-like quality. On Tuesday, his beleaguered press aide, Barbara Morgan, told reporters ahead of a candidates’ forum that he would speak to them after the event, which proved untrue when the spindly Weiner walked briskly down the stairs and away from the throng giving chase. A CNN reporter yelled a question at him about whether he’d fired off any recent sexts, after he gave a fuzzy answer to the Daily News. A debate ensued between the reporter and Morgan as to whether Weiner actually answered the question. “He said no,” Morgan said repeatedly. Even in an age of resurrections — Eliot Spitzer is running ahead for city comptroller, and Andrew Dice Clay got himself a starring role in the new Woody Allen movie — Weiner is pushing the limits. Instead of using 2013 to wipe 2011 clean from people’s minds and give him a fresh start for the next run, he’s brought the scandal back into the present and created more bad blood than there ever was when he resigned in tears. New Yorkers appear to have gotten tired of the performance. A Quinnipiac poll out Monday showed not just that he’d tumbled to fourth place, but that 53 percent of New Yorkers want him out of the race. The reservoir of good will and second chances appears to be heading quickly down the drain, and Weiner is at the dangerous point for a politician where many people would be ready to believe just about anything about him and doubt every word that comes out of his mouth. Weiner’s response has been defiance, still appearing to try to outsmart questions and refusing direct answers. He told a woman over the weekend who asked how he could run after behavior that would have gotten her fired that he was moving on to other voters he might be able to win. If there is any a strategy left, Weiner’s hope seems to be that the rest of the field remains weak enough and that New Yorkers remain susceptible enough to his street bruiser politicking charm that he’ll be able to recover ahead of the Sept. 10 primary. He’ll try to tap into the same New Yorker spirit that responded to Ed Koch — a coalition of had-it-up-to-here and outer-borough voters who responded to the former mayor’s puckishness and middle-class pitch that put him over the top in the equally crowded 1977 Democratic primary. Weiner has made the Koch comparison himself explicitly before. He even made it to Koch directly before the former mayor died, looking for an endorsement by arguing “I’m trying to be just like you,” recalled Koch’s former press secretary and confidant, George Arzt. Koch said no. “There’s something about Weiner that just irritated Koch,” Arzt, now a New York-based Democratic consultant, said. Weiner is proving every day just how unlike Koch he is, Arzt argued, and how deep in trouble he’s gotten. “He’s a guy who’s run amok. He’s in desperate shape, and he’s just trying to find a way to salvage a public career — not only a political career,” he said. “He looks like a punch-drunk guy trying to survive the fight, and he’s just wobbling around the ring, and getting hit with every punch from all directions.” As Weiner tells the story, he’s Rocky (circa Rocky II). “I think in an odd way, this is a great test for the kind of mayor I will be,” he said in the Daily News interview. “I will not quit on my stool.” But Cunningham said New York is past the point of caring whether or not Weiner wants to give up. “Once you become a punch line, once you become a running joke and once you start to show flashes of temper and annoyance at questions about a situation he himself created,” he said, “I think you’ve kicked out all the legs of the three-legged stool.” Clarification: Due to an error made by the New York Daily News in transcription, POLITICO has removed a quote from that paper’s interview with Weiner because it was out of context. Read more: http://www.politico.com/story/2013/07/anthony-weiner-unraveling-94940.html#ixzz2ajlkfnci

Why Talk when you can Throw Tomatoes ?

I suppose nobody here has been to The Baton, But there are more than a few bitch slaps about Chilli making the rounds. And to HITO, you'll find much hotter men looking to rape you in a pair of come-fuck-me-pumps at the Baton than you'll ever discover at the Children's Museum.

Lucky, great story. You are bold. That was a risky move you made in order to get him but it paid off. And, just IMHO, if you see him again, he will be willing to do more and more. This makes me wonder just how many of you reading this would have approached the guy in the first place? I know for me, it is easy as I am not shy in the least. But, I know many would think it is not something they would be able to do. For Lucky, it paid off. But, would you be able to bring up this to a stranger in a location that is not a pick up place?

I love it when you talk dirty.

Blatantly stolen from edjames who posted this on the other site: On the morning that Daylight Savings Time ended, I stopped in to visit my aging friend. He was busy covering his penis with black shoe polish. So I say to the man: "Sean, you're supposed to turn your clock back."

Uruguay votes to create world's first national legal marijuana marketProposals likely to become law, leading to innovative policies at odds with the 'war on drugs' philosophy Associated Press in Montevideo theguardian.com, Thursday 1 August 2013 00.07 EDT Uruguayan MPs vote through the bill legalising a marijuana market. Photograph: AFP Uruguay's unprecedented plan to create a legal marijuana market has taken its critical first step in the lower house of Congress. All 50 members of the ruling Broad Front coalition approved the proposal just before midnight on Wednesday in a party line vote, keeping a narrow majority of the 96 MPs present after more than 13 hours of passionate debate. The measure now goes to the Senate, where passage is expected to make Uruguay the first country in the world to license and enforce rules for the production, distribution and sale of marijuana for adult consumers. Legislators in the ruling coalition said putting the government at the centre of a legal marijuana industry is worth trying because the global war on drugs had been a costly and bloody failure, and displacing illegal dealers through licensed marijuana sales could save money and lives. They also hope to eliminate a legal contradiction in Uruguay, where it has been legal to use marijuana but against the law to sell it, buy it, produce it or possess even one plant. "Uruguay appears poised, in the weeks ahead, to become the first nation in modern times to create a legal, regulated framework for marijuana," said John Walsh, a drug policy expert at the Washington Office on Latin America. "In doing so, Uruguay will be bravely taking a leading role in establishing and testing a compelling alternative to the prohibitionist paradigm." Opponents of the proposal warned that marijuana use led to harder drugs and said fostering the bad habits of users was playing with fire. President José Mujica had postponed voting for six months to give supporters more time to rally public opinion. However, recent polls said two-thirds of Uruguayans remained opposed despite a "responsible regulation" campaign for the bill. National Party deputy Gerardo Amarilla said the government was underestimating the risk of marijuana, which he called a "gateway drug" for other chemical addictions that foster violent crimes. "Ninety-eight percent of those who are today destroying themselves with base cocaine began with marijuana," Amarilla said. "I believe that we're risking too much. I have the sensation that we're playing with fire." Dozens of pro-marijuana activists followed the debate from balconies overlooking the house floor, while others outside held signs and danced to reggae music. "This law consecrates a reality that already exists: The marijuana sales market has existed for a long time, but illegally, buying it from traffickers, and in having plants in your house for which you can be thrown in jail," said Camilo Collazo, a 25-year-old anthropology student. "We want to put an end to this, to clean up and normalise the situation." Mujica said he never consumed marijuana, but that the regulations were necessary because many other people did. "Never in my life did I try it, nor do I have any idea what it is," he told the local radio station Carve. The secretary-general of the Organisation of American States, José Miguel Inzulza, told Mujica last week his members had no objections. But Pope Francis said during his visit to Brazil that the "liberalisation of drugs, which is being discussed in several Latin American countries, is not what will reduce the spread of chemical substances". Under the legislation, Uruguay's government would license growers, sellers and consumers, and update a confidential registry to keep people from buying more than 40g a month. Carrying, growing or selling marijuana without a licence could bring prison terms, but licensed consumers could grow up to six plants at a time at home. Growing clubs with up to 45 members each would be encouraged, fostering enough marijuana production to drive out unlicensed dealers and draw a line between marijuana smokers and users of harder drugs. The latest proposal "has some adjustments, aimed at strengthening the educational issue and prohibiting driving under the effects of cannabis", ruling coalition deputy Sebastian Sabini said. "There will be self-growing clubs, and it will also be possible to buy marijuana in pharmacies" that is mass-produced by private companies. An Institute for Regulation and Control of Cannabis would be created, with the power to grant licences for all aspects of a legal industry to produce marijuana for recreational, medicinal or industrial use. http://www.theguardian.com/society/2013/aug/01/uruguay-first-legal-marijuana-market

The Time Hillary Was Right About Obama in 2008 Elspeth Reeve 11:01 AM ET The Atlantic Wire Some people wondered why Hillary Clinton failed to inspired voters in the 2008 presidential campaign with an explicitly cynical message. Mocking then-Sen. Barack Obama, Clinton said, "I could stand up here and say: let’s just get everybody together, let’s get unified… The sky will open, the light will come down, celestial choirs will be singing, and everyone will know that we should do the right thing, and the world would be perfect." Get real, she said. She'd lived through the 90s. "Maybe I’ve just lived a little long, but I have no illusions about how hard this will be. You are not going to wave a magic wand…" She did not win the Democratic nomination. But, Politico's Glenn Thrush points out, history has proved her right. Even Obama admits his speeches don't work like magic on House Republicans. Obama himself has explicitly endorsed the no-magic-wands view. "I wish I had a magic wand and could make this all happen on my own," Obama said of congressional inaction on the DREAM Act in 2011. Earlier this year, he complained, "Even though most people agree that I'm being reasonable; that most people agree I'm presenting a fair deal; the fact they don't take it means I should somehow do a Jedi mind meld with these folks and convince them to do what's right." I told you so, Clinton adviser James Carville says. "His message was 'I can transcend Washington' — her message was 'I can bend it, I can cut through it,'" Carville told Politico. "Guess which one turned out to be right?" Many commentators have urged Obama to show leadership by somehow transcending partisan politics. The New York Times' Maureen Dowd, for example, has pointed to the leadership shown in the movie The American President. But she's also suggested Obama could learn from the Clintons' experience in the '90s. "The Clintons have emerged stronger on the back end of their scandals," Dowd said. "America’s ultimate survivors are now truly potent or dangerous, depending on how you look at it, because Americans love them Bridget Jones-style, just the way they are, warts and all." In fact, Clinton learned so much as first lady that Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid thinks she'd be able to top Bill Clinton's performance. "I think that they’re a pretty good team, but she’ll handle things probably even better than he did," Reid told PBS. http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/08/time-hillary-was-right-about-obama-2008/67862/