All Activity

Thanks, fascinating explanation I enjoyed reading it. Don’t want to derail @jason1975’s trip report further but instead of naming trivia I’m curious about all those ghost stories from Suvarnabhumi….

Stories of animals being treated kindly like this make me happy. 🥰 A gold star for Guido.🏅

ok it looks like I got some great advice. I know this is not the Vietnam forum.... but how about Ho Chi Minh in April? Maybe for a week?

Just a comforting tap on the head, the cat that is! It seems that Cloudy has her own suite on the second floor! She (he) retires there when they lock up. Guido said she has her own chef, ie the kitchen cook scraps for her, so she does well.

We always need two bridesmaids, so that works out beautifully.

Did you give his pussy a few gentle strokes while you were there? I'm sure he would have liked that even better. 😉

Hahahah … I was wondering when the panic would set in as it’s down almost 2 weeks. In short, to be reinstated em breve. I think it will be a reset without the post history. There have been a few other changes too inconsequential to list, not that any represent improvements regarding the venue’s deficits. These things sometimes occur when nobody is designated as backup for accounts and passwords and the social media organizer has moved on. IDK in this case. The onsite A/C bar screen ads are reinstated, I would surmise a harbinger for Instagram, X, &c reappearance.

Like the man said. The notion of deprivation is primed more robustly when something is taken away, but it’s both a flimsy argument and accompanied by the absence of comparability in such a way as to circle back to the deprivation narrative. That additionally contributes to the perception and assertion that the practice is essentially heinous. Yet if it shoulda coulda woulda been limited or restricted there’d be no additional data to support the same idea regarding sensitivity and function. Only a ratio shift in terms of the circumcision binary. An extant sufficient proportionality among billions globally has yet to yield consensus. Anchored beliefs are hard to crack. We know this as well based on other platforms whose language and imagery supports the concern that paedophilia adjacency is subtly if not overtly endorsed to the extent that interested members are turned off and refrain from explicit descriptions of trade experiences due to the risk of inadvertent association with perversion.

Cat, Cloudy, on Guidi's lap, so i told him about the blog, of which he did not know! He laughed a lot, and really liked it

feccc1bd3397b6caed4586ea4f36b883.mp4

Try not to get too sucked in, @unicorn

Because what it predicts is what will annoy most.

That you describe it as mutilation is a thing. I need to know the BMI of anybody weighing in on this topic … that and other adult variables influence my response.

I find the difference impossible to gauge due to where the member is predominantly positioned.

Just over 17? One would think some think it’s more flexible. I’m not one of them. They are also sad cases hiding behind an arbitrary age setpoint when some areas of autonomy are undermined by the expediency of access to life’s necessaries. Forced choice. As you know, and as some sex tourists integrate sensitively into opportunistic play.

I think I've hard about that piece of trash. But my point was about the morals of most people who have sexual desires they may not and do not act on IRL. That was what the commotion was about in France. I'm saying that it shouldn't matter what the dolls look like, it's a doll, not a living being. It wont corrupt people more than violence on TV or video games.

Suwannaphumi, pronounced as Suwannaphum is what happens when Sanskrit conflates with Thai. The word suwannaphumi is borrowed from Sanskrit (as many grand Thai names are) and in Sanskrit, the final i sound is pronounced. Suwar-na-bhu-mi. The r sound in the middle is also trilled. In other words, you say it as you see it. Easy right? When adopted into Thai, the Thai spelling follows the way it is pronounced in Sanskrit but the pronunciation follows Thai pronunciation rules and the final i sound becomes silent. Therefore the transliteration is not wrong. There's some interesting trivia surrounding the naming of the airport, bestowed by the late ร. 9, which you can look up for yourself. 😅 Thai to English transliteration isn't an exact science - there are supposed to be some guidelines/standard somewhere and even these have evolved and not necessarily followed to a T. The final product really depends on the person doing the transliteration! I've never really bothered with it as I learned the Thai script from the start.

I haven’t met a circumcised man in my personal life incapable of robust orgasm. I have met uncut men incapable of arousal and orgasm. I haven’t treated a man in my practice who proclaimed an association between circumcision status and sexual response … yet inquiring about sexual function was boilerplate in my practice. The substantial majority of men in my practice presenting with function concerns had exercised the adult autonomy of doing shit do their bodies. Some went on to pursue major invasive surgery, costly rehab, etc etc, in attempts to mitigate the sequelae of that shit. I have about half of foreskin tissue residually present at about complete lower circumference, a little less aesthetically idiosyncratic than if it were 21:00-03:00. The northern boreal doc must have been abruptly called to an emergency mid-procedure that left my southern half unexposed. Not one iota of sensitivity differential. Sensitivity is too uniformly high to discern a difference. I don’t add this to make a case, as anecdotes aren’t worth the splash of half and half in your coffee while the trajectory of my emissions is not governed by hemispheric variables.

I have ALWAYS enjoyed an UNCUT penis more...... I am a big fan of having "a little SKIN in the game"..... Its just so much fun to Play with ! 👍

Ya think ? Trump and his mafia family have decided its easier and more efficient to KILL YOU than deal with and pay for all the bullshit that comes with Capturing and disappearing you. Why bother, just cut to the chase.. Cosplay Noem and Screaming Miller salivate at the idea of violence, and they love that they have the whole world SHAKING in their boots. FEAR is making America GREAT again, and it sure is a GOLDEN AGE, for some people. Trump has now eliminated your right to peacefully protest, dissent, disagree and question HIM and his policy, and has vowed to PROTECT ICE at all cost, meaning NO accountability for them, EVER..... He has made it clear once again that if you ACT in service of HIM, you can do anything, any way and not fear prosecution. And with the job market now pretty much DEAD, joining the ICE Killing machine is a pretty profitable gig for all the brain dead LOSERS that find the lure of money more valuable than LIFE ! Unless someone or something STOPS Trump, we are pretty much fucked. He now feels and acts omnipotent, telling us he can only be stopped by HIMSELF. And he is determined to distract us all from the Epstein saga, so the more crazy he acts, the more he distracts us. He is the example of what INSANITY looks like.

I have heard about lack of sensitivity several times before, but how does anyone know unless a man has chosen - or been persuaded - to be circumcised after becoming sexually active. The Old Testament tells us Abraham was circumised at the age of 100. Pity he did not leave any notes on sensitivity or lack thereof! For Christians, circumcision was never prescribed and this goes as far back as the Apostle Paul and the New Testament. Indeed at the Council of Florence in the mid-15th century, the Roman Catholic Church specificallly forbade the practice. Going further back, the Greek and Roman civilisations were basically revolted by the idea. The much more modern practice got a major boost in the mid 19th century when a British physician Jonathan Hutchison was searching for either a cure or means to control the rampant spread of syphilis. He had noted that Jews in paricular had a lower incidence of syphilis. This led to the belief that circumcision was a major help and this view quickly spread to the USA. But another as comelling reason helped spread that popularity for the good people of the USA. Hurchison and his colleagues believed that absence of the foreskin would reduce the sensitivity of the organ and hence reduce the prevalence of masturbation in males. In his later 1893 article titled On Circumcision as a Preventive of Masturbation, he wrote - "I am inclined to believe that [circumcision] may often accomplish much, both in breaking the habit [of masturbation] as an immediate result, and in diminishing the temptation to it subsequently." This was prticularly appealing to certain US Churches which very quickly promoted circumcision amongst their members. Although I believe not true today, Hutchison continued to preach this 'doctine' for the next 50 years. 15 years after Hutchison, an American orthopedic surgeon Lewis Sayre latched on to this view about circumcision being effective in promoting good health. With the end of World War 2 and the establishment of the National Health Service in Britain, a 1949 article The Fate of the Foreskin by Douglas Gairdner in the UK argued that evidence showed the risks outweighed the benefits. In the USA however, the popular physician Benjamn Spock was an outspoken proponent of the procedure. His book The Comon Sense Book of Baby and Child Care led to a huge rise in demand from parents, all this while Europe was slowly turning away from circumcision and it had never caught on in Central and South America. I suppose it is not really possible to discuss circumcision without a note on religion. The Old Testament mentions it being an essential covenant between God and man. - hence its particular appeal to those of the Jewish faith. Trying not to be flippant about a serious subject, I wonder how excision of the foreskin can be regarded as an essential "covenant". Christianity has basically replaced this with baptism for two millannia. Yet in the same NT volume, the Book of Genesis mentions God creating man in his own image. Does this mean God had no foreskin? If not, why was man created with one? I have had little interest in religion but find much of its teachings, shall we say, strange.

And a hot story to share!

No, in fact, what a boring vocal minority and pill you are, still trolling here, generic Aubnocksius, brand Ahzwhole, streetname ‘Keethqueef’ for its noteworthy hit of induced boredom. As well as an apt intrafamilial reference point for an inlaw’s take on a presidents’ personality. Yet easy for any smart person to exposed to metabolize. Nice try to distract from your actual relatability to the topic and reality that the proportional age-associated weighting of your personal genital observation in a LMIC would add another layer to her psychodiagnostic formulation. Tell her I had a Keethqueef slipped into my caipirinha and see her knowing nod, the one distinct from nodding off to the Nobody 1 & 2 film series streaming on Apple.

Yes. Strictly it's Phra Ram IV. (Phra is an honorific denoting royalty). But in casual Thai speech, Rs tends to turn into L or N or disappear altogether.