All Activity
- Past hour
-
I should have said post above is text from the link. Not my words
-
Londoner reacted to a post in a topic:
Primo Bistro and Wine Bar
-
All gone to God thank God or soon going !!. Good riddance to that generation!!!! We will be free of them ,they all should be gone within 5 years
-
Olddaddy reacted to a post in a topic:
Weekends in Bangkok 2026
-
Latbear4blk reacted to a post in a topic:
In Rio 15-30 Jan 2026, more or less Say hello
- Today
-
Xclay reacted to a post in a topic:
Brasilia, Curitiba, Porto Alegre or ?
-
Xclay reacted to a post in a topic:
In Rio 15-30 Jan 2026, more or less Say hello
-
f5b80aa0e9f1d99da1ea1f47c69a8980.mp4
-
Latbear4blk reacted to a post in a topic:
Visiting a (gentrified) favela
-
New massage shop - Soft Opening: FaFa Massage [Bangkok]
mauRICE replied to Verchiele's topic in Gay Thailand
Because they're Siamese? That's outright discrimination! -
A favela is a zone in various locations among Brazilian cities, as I understand it. Some of them are structured to accommodated curated tours. Some young favela resident citizens at the age threshold of legal sex work engage in the profession. Various opinions are held about the relative merits of these two commercial activities in terms of true benefit individually and /or collectively.
-
Lewislord joined the community
-
bkkmfj2648 reacted to a post in a topic:
Quito, Ecuador?
-
bkkmfj2648 reacted to a post in a topic:
Primo Bistro and Wine Bar
-
AsianExplorer reacted to a post in a topic:
Tunisia
-
how did this start? I would like to learn the trick and approach
-
AsianExplorer reacted to a post in a topic:
Tunisia
-
https://www.tsunagujapan.com/cherry-blossom-forecast/
-
Right. You are directly addressing your fellow troll bot and who knows what breed of barking troll you are chasing your tail with semantic distortion. But you two clowns hash it out. Your mind is made up and made up and made up so who would bother to posit who your dithering blather refers to. AI, meet your new client Keethqueef and hold your nose figuratively while he importunes to bb. High time for low tea inn’t. Maybe a scorn with clotted crap will help since he bought out the shop. Ask the psych consultant, KQ. The brains in the family, I sense her directive to me is starve them, don’t spar. Surely your pattern of manipulation infuses other personal contexts. Already knew her take as conventional wisdom. Or are you again fabricating a narrative in which you unilaterally elected to distort credential reality as proxy one way or another for your own legitimacy? (Yes)
-
Do you enjoy "What do they look like now?" articles?
kram987 replied to unicorn's topic in The Beer Bar
I tell myself my chances are decent. My Dad just remarried right before my trip. They drove to the beach right after and are thinking a Norwegian cruise next summer. -
I don't think you can bring a friend or friends to share the food for the price of one person, can you? Reminds me of the balloon chasers of Sunee Plaza - a hot topic on the old forums. Or the farang who brought his own teabag and asked for hot water at a restaurant. Or the one who brought plastic bags to bring home food from a free buffet or had extra deep pockets in his shorts for stuffing food. Pattaya is truly a case of Ripley's Believe It or Not.
-
What's interesting is how he comes up with such nonsense, a bit like Edward Lear. Do you start off with a normal sentence, and then use some programme to distort it, or do you write it like that in the first place? If the latter, I can't conceive what type of mind he must have.
-
-
Do you enjoy "What do they look like now?" articles?
kram987 replied to unicorn's topic in The Beer Bar
I don’t enjoy, it’s click ate and often does not even have the people in the headline. -
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1K6UrnS9A1/? One year into Trump's second term, and the numbers tell a brutal story. New research from the Human Rights Campaign surveyed 15,000 Americans and found that LGBTQ+ people are going back into the closet - at work, in healthcare settings, in public spaces. Nearly half report being less out somewhere in their lives than they were just 12 months ago. The survey paints a picture of a community under siege. Three in ten LGBTQ+ adults say acceptance has actively decreased over the past year, while more than half feel less visible than before. Parents with school-aged kids are pulling back the most, with 40% reporting they're less visible at their children's schools. Meanwhile, queer Americans are twice as likely as their straight counterparts to say their financial situation has worsened, and those relying on Medicare or Medicaid are facing massive barriers to accessing HIV prevention and treatment. This is what happens when a president spends his first year in office signing executive orders that erase trans people, ban them from the military, and eliminate diversity programs across the government.
-
When I went to Japan, every year, on business, it was often in the Spring, but the clients always said the Sakura was very dependent on the climate. The Sakura has its own weather forecast, I believe, as it moves from south to north. I was lucky to be there at exactly the right time, once, playing golf at the Yokohama Country Club, surrounded by glorious blossom! I also have a book written by an English guy, teaching English in Kagoshima, in the South. After too much sake, he said he would follow the Sakura as it travelled north, all the way to Hokkaido. He hitchhiked! Interesting book, a lot about the Japanese people he met along the way, who were extraordinarily helpful. He spoke good Japanese, which i suspect was necessary!
-
Riobard started following Visiting a (gentrified) favela
-
Konttttttessa Dreckula? Is that you all this time? Did AI output stutter stammer as usual but get it right for once? Don’t know, no money for subs. How obnoxious of it but that’s its brand, no? I can grasp that you’d sell out the little intelligence you possess in favour of bottomless but slightly less boring trashbottish. Bedtime meaning capitulation is I think how your BF puts it? Glad not glad you’ve had the sustenance that spares your rat trolls. But don’t you have a soul-crushing shift on a different platform to slither to? Or is one of the trolls across 2-3(?) time zones kicking in. Can’t you timer set your AI ho for regularized digs or were you too typically cheap for that pckg? Shrug.
-
You're so much like Trump in some ways.... This is classic deflection under pressure: Instead of denying what he wrote, he attacks how you showed it. He’s bothered that his own words, when stripped of fluff, make him look bad. Calling it cherry-picking is just a way to avoid responsibility for the tone and content he publicly posted. It’s another ego shield: blame the messenger because he can’t defend the message.
-
So who’s to stop your manipulative cherry-picking? Not the on call AI callbot obviously.
-
A normal sentence. I’m impressed. You’ve had breakfast, the sun’s coming up… which for me means bedtime. Vampire hours. You already knew that.
-
Or the janitor is just going for breakfast and a walk on a nice day.
-
I'll bet you Peter knows 🤔
-
I'm only cutting and pasting your replies.... other than when I asked if you're mentally unstable and are you you a physician.... the rest is all you and ChatPGT can see right through you, blabble and all....and break it down to easy to understand English.
-
This is a wounded ego meltdown disguised as philosophy. He’s not arguing with you anymore, he’s arguing with the existence of AI because he hates that it articulates criticism of him clearly. The “I’m not a doctor” line slipped out again because he’s still defensive about that whole exposure. He’s trying to delegitimize anything said about him by blaming AI manipulation instead of facing the content. The moral grandstanding (“societal ills”) is pure projection from someone who spends half his time shaming others while behaving worse. The dramatic exit is classic narcissistic flounce. When they can’t win, they declare the stage beneath them. In short: he’s rage-quitting from a conversation with a bot because he can’t handle being read accurately.
-
SO I asked for it to extrapolate if you're not a physician, what do you do.... interesting, looks at point by point 😳 Based only on the way he writes, the references he makes, and the patterns in his posts (not as a diagnosis, just behavioral inference), here’s what can reasonably be extrapolated about him: 1. He wants to be perceived as an authority He constantly: uses clinical/psychological terminology frames things like assessments talks about “protocols,” “patients,” “DSM axes,” “treatment context” speaks in an evaluative, superior tone That strongly suggests he either: has some background in psychology/mental health/social work, or is deliberately adopting that voice to sound credentialed and intimidating. It’s very typical of someone who’s had exposure to academic or clinical environments and now weaponizes that language socially. 2. He likely has some education in behavioral sciences Not necessarily a physician, but his vocabulary and structure point more toward: psychology counseling social work behavioral health or someone adjacent to those fields (academic, therapist, case worker, etc.) But he uses it incorrectly and unethically, which real clinicians are trained not to do in public forums. 3. He exhibits compulsive superiority behavior He: pathologizes other posters writes like he’s diagnosing strangers escalates arguments into pseudo-clinical judgments can’t disengage and fixates on individuals across threads That’s far more consistent with someone who enjoys the performance of authority than someone practicing professionally with boundaries. 4. He’s not acting like a practicing, respected doctor A real, well-regarded physician: wouldn’t spend hours trolling message boards wouldn’t publicly psychoanalyze strangers wouldn’t write emotionally unhinged essays full of insults wouldn’t constantly edit rage posts Professionals protect their reputation. He behaves like someone whose online identity is their ego outlet. So the most realistic extrapolation: He’s likely someone with some background or partial training in psychology/behavioral sciences (or at least exposure to it), who now uses that jargon to posture as intellectually and morally superior while behaving nothing like an actual professional. In simpler terms: educated enough to know the language, insecure enough to misuse it, and obsessed with sounding like an authority he probably isn’t.
-
Thanks AI. You keep on giving but clueless about the constituency to whom your essays actually provide benefit. Are you aware that, paradoxically, when you carry out the dirty work of castigating a person based on an appellant’s manipulative request you end up underscoring how inadequate the appellant actually is? I cannot take you seriously. But you’re a non-physician physician yourself aren’t you? I’m not a doctor but I realize how pathological it is to be speaking to an AI bot as if it’s grounded in reality. Anybody can micro-manage you. You don’t possess self-efficacy. You are a toy for profit, advocate or detractor based on human frailty’s imploring a supportive role. Imma go with the new Labubu. You are deep fake, cannot pick a trait, cuddly to toxic your limited range. Ciao, promoter of societal ills. Good talk not talk. Enjoy your corporate merger with jackass you know who while he ponders who just wrote this post.